Modify code example so that the original user claims are not deleted

[lettuceDestroyer]

Description

When following the instructions on the section Customize the user with a payload claim we are essentially overriding the claims which the authentication provider provides. This might not be what the developer wants or expects. I think I would make sense to write a comment to make sure the user is aware of this "problem". An other possibility would be to insert a link to this documentation as it does not cause the same problem.

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/security/webassembly/additional-scenarios?view=aspnetcore-8.0#customize-the-user

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs/blob/main/aspnetcore/blazor/security/webassembly/additional-scenarios.md

Document ID

cc8dfcd6-8d93-5aa3-c381-2b613e88cdbe

Article author

@guardrex

[github-actions]

😎 Welcome April! Summertime is almost here! 🌞

A green dinosaur 🦖 will be along shortly to assist. Stand-by ........

[guardrex]

Thanks @lettuceDestroyer .... I'll take a look at this for updates soon.

[guardrex]

@lettuceDestroyer ... I'm a bit buried at the moment 🏃😅. I hope to be able to reach no later than the end of next week. I have a few high priority items on my plate at the moment.

[guardrex]

It didn't work out for last week.

I'm getting closer to this, but a new high priority work item arrived for a new Blazor MAUI article.

I'll get to this issue as soon as I can 🏃‍♂.

[lettuceDestroyer]

@guardrex Don't worry, I have all the time in the world. In the mean time good luck 🍀

[guardrex]

I finally reached this for a look 😅.

I don't know why this would be the case. Let's ask @halter73 to take a look at this issue.

Stephen, if @lettuceDestroyer's report is correct, what other code preserves the claims that I can show SxS with this code? I'd rather not link off to the other article. It's better to show both approaches here in this article.

[lettuceDestroyer]

@guardrex @halter73 I tried it again and it seems to work now in the way the documentation describes it. I unfortunately do not know why the code did not previously work since my project developed quite a bit in this short time. Thank you for looking into it.

[guardrex]

Sure thing ... that's what I thought because I didn't see a reason why the code would be doing that AND my test apps never demonstrated that behavior.

I'm glad it had a happy ending! 🎉