Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue when using SwiftLint, carthage failed to build scheme #159

Open
martiwi opened this issue Sep 28, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Issue when using SwiftLint, carthage failed to build scheme #159

martiwi opened this issue Sep 28, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@martiwi
Copy link

martiwi commented Sep 28, 2017

When SwiftLint is installed it is not possible to use this library because it fails during build scheme step when doing Carthage update.

Build failed:
Task failed with exit code 65.

When uninstalling SwiftLint, it builds with success.

Do you need anything else to help you investigate/fix this issue ?

Regards,

@MP0w
Copy link
Member

MP0w commented Oct 16, 2017

Weird I have to check, but used swiftlint during development but maybe a new version breaks

@damien-rivet
Copy link

damien-rivet commented Jan 11, 2018

Hi,

I'm having the same issue here. Seems that SwiftLint doesn't like the 191 violations (including 21 serious ones, which breaks the build).

Miscellaneous

Information Value
IDE XCode 9.2 (CLI version is the same)
SwiftLint 0.24.1
Carthage 0.27.0

EDIT: #160 will also fix this issue as a by-product.

@zzarcon
Copy link
Member

zzarcon commented Feb 11, 2018

@MP0w any update?

@martiwi
Copy link
Author

martiwi commented Apr 18, 2018

@MP0w ? :)

@MP0w
Copy link
Member

MP0w commented Apr 18, 2018

Hey all, the code did lint with the version of swiftlint I used at the time of development. ATM I’m not sure when I will have time to update it but anyone feel free to fix the new issues reported by new versions and submit a PR!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants