Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to setup different schedulers on Deis provision #9

Open
sgoings opened this issue Sep 3, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Add option to setup different schedulers on Deis provision #9

sgoings opened this issue Sep 3, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@sgoings
Copy link
Member

sgoings commented Sep 3, 2015

During the public release planning meeting, @smothiki brought up the idea that being able to choose what scheduler to use with Deis would be a desirable feature for rigger.

The way I would consider implementing that would be:

  • add a question that asks this question: "What scheduler would you like to use?" with options:
    • fleet (default)
    • swarm
    • kubernetes
    • mesos
  • pick up on this variable (DEIS_SCHEDULER) during the provisioning process (where it makes sense).
@smothiki
Copy link

smothiki commented Sep 3, 2015

👍

1 similar comment
@rimusz
Copy link

rimusz commented Oct 7, 2015

👍

@elifarley
Copy link

I suggest that comments containing only a reaction icon (like 👍) should be avoided. Showing the reaction on the original comment takes a lot less screen space and makes it easier to count the number of people with a given reaction.

@bacongobbler
Copy link
Member

@elifarley reactions were just introduced last week. Yes we will use them moving forward.

@bacongobbler
Copy link
Member

The scheduler tech previews have been removed from the Deis LTS as of deis/deis#4861 (see deis/deis#4860 for context), so there are no more schedulers to choose from other than Fleet for v1. I'd vote that we do not implement this.

@smothiki
Copy link

Is there any plan to modify rigger to install deis v2 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants