LXC backend?
#2945
Replies: 2 comments
-
Dagger uses Buildkit to manage containers. And Buildkit relies on runc. So you should ask this question on the buildkit repository. However technically, nothing prevents you to leverage |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Yeh, fair enough - seems like BuildKit itself is probably a little too tied to OCI to make LXD a likely feature. I have got something working by mounting the socket for now, thanks for the tip. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey 👋
Interested in if folks would find a LXC backend for Dagger useful, and how difficult that would likely be to implement?
I've got a couple of CI pipelines for end-to-end testing of services that check on the state of systemd units, and presence of snap packages etc. These things are pretty hard to achieve in a purely OCI-image world; adding LXC support would still keep the process pretty light and container based, but give more options to teams with more system-oriented code to test?
Many thanks!
Jon
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions