Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different results to Phonelib.valid in minor versions 0.6.44 and 0.6.48 #219

Open
rafamelo12 opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
missing validation data data for some prefix/country is missing in the souce

Comments

@rafamelo12
Copy link

Hello, this number +33690687351 was valid on Version 0.6.44 but on Version 0.6.48 it says it's not valid.
Do you know what have changed in those minor versions that could have affected this?

Screenshot Version: 0.6.44
image

Screenshot Version 0.6.48
image

If you need more info, please let me know!
Thanks

@daddyz
Copy link
Owner

daddyz commented Mar 14, 2021

@rafamelo12 This number is also parsed as invalid in original libphonenumber. You can check it here and open an issue for them. Gem's data is based on it.

@daddyz daddyz added the missing validation data data for some prefix/country is missing in the souce label Mar 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
missing validation data data for some prefix/country is missing in the souce
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants