Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the repository status? #168

Open
jmauro opened this issue May 27, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

What is the repository status? #168

jmauro opened this issue May 27, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@jmauro
Copy link

jmauro commented May 27, 2023

Hello,

It seems that the repository doesn't have a lot of recent activity, is this on purpose or the maintainers stopped this project?

Kind regards,
JM

@rothgar
Copy link

rothgar commented May 30, 2023

I looks inactive based on the pull requests, open issues, and commit history.

@jmauro
Copy link
Author

jmauro commented May 30, 2023

It would be good to get the point of view of the maintainers...

@Natolumin
Copy link
Member

Being realistic, I'd say you shouldn't expect any activity in this repo

I haven't had contact with the other maintainers for several years now (I haven't tried very hard either) and they haven't been active here. I don't think they're completely disinterested in this field considering the dhcp library is still actively maintained, but I can't speak for them obviously.

Although I think I would like to keep maintaining this repo, I do not have full access to it, only basic committer permissions - I can accept submitted PRs, but not push or accept my own code (which is very limiting) or otherwise change repo configuration.

There are people who seemed interested in taking up a fork in a different repo in a few recent PRs, and I'd say in the short term that's your best bet

@insomniacslk
Copy link
Member

insomniacslk commented Oct 9, 2023

I am planning to resume the work on CoreDHCP now, after I got burned once again by other implementations. As a first step I'll try to stabilize and clean up the core plugins (where needed); then I want to resume the work on offering a better configuration language (either via #89 or #91 ). Any help from @Natolumin will be critical to do a better job, and highly appreciated, but I'm OK with working on this alone, hopefully with community input.

@farcaller
Copy link

@insomniacslk I would appreciate having some release tags moving forward. Anything is better than just randomly tracking the master. I was about to add a nix package for this earlier today as I got burned by dnsmasq issues, and I learned there's not a single "release".

@insomniacslk
Copy link
Member

insomniacslk commented Oct 14, 2023

@farcaller I agreee with you. This was a side project and I didn't expect more than me and a few others to use it, but judging by forks and stars on this repo, it deserves proper love.

EDIT: please note that I'll be stabilizing the range plugin before creating the first release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants