Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using beta channel with JavaScript (ES6+) throws errors #306

Closed
rangoo94 opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Using beta channel with JavaScript (ES6+) throws errors #306

rangoo94 opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rangoo94
Copy link

rangoo94 commented Apr 3, 2018

I get errors inside of CodeClimate build during duplication process:

ERROR: couldn't find node type RestProperty in Sexp::NODE_NAMES.
ERROR: couldn't find node type SpreadProperty in Sexp::NODE_NAMES.
ERROR: couldn't find node type SpreadElement in Sexp::NODE_NAMES.
ERROR: couldn't find node type ClassExpression in Sexp::NODE_NAMES.
ERROR: couldn't find node type ForOfStatement in Sexp::NODE_NAMES.
ERROR: couldn't find node type AwaitExpression in Sexp::NODE_NAMES.
ERROR: couldn't find node type RestElement in Sexp::NODE_NAMES.

It seems that it doesn't know how to handle newer node types in JavaScript AST.

@wfleming
Copy link
Contributor

wfleming commented Apr 3, 2018

Hi @rangoo94,

Sorry for the trouble. The beta channel is deprecated, and has not been updated in quite some time. It was created to give users the opportunity to test some new features, but wasn't intended to be used long-term. I'd suggest you please shift back to the stable (default) channel. Sorry that the communication around this deprecation missed you.

@wfleming
Copy link
Contributor

wfleming commented Apr 3, 2018

I just read the comments on your ui-kit PR, and want to clarify that the changes that were being tested on the beta channel are on stable now, and other improvements since then as well.

@rangoo94
Copy link
Author

rangoo94 commented Apr 3, 2018

Okay, thank you very much for the information, I tried beta channel, because of #89, where it's mentioned that it's working better on beta thanks to #190. I will close that ticket then, and I will look if there is a place for improvement in such situations.

Have a nice day!

@rangoo94 rangoo94 closed this as completed Apr 3, 2018
@wfleming
Copy link
Contributor

wfleming commented Apr 3, 2018

Ah, thank you for mentioning the ticket that pointed you towards beta. I'll take a look at that and update/close as appropriate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants