Relicensing Lethe

[blaisb]

During this week's Hackathon we discussed relicensing for Lethe in order to increase the flexibility of our license and also to remain coherent with the license that is used by deal.II.

Deal.II uses a dual license under: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR LGPL-2.1-or-later
I propose we use the same license.

One of the main target of this issue is to gather an OK from every past and present contributers (meaning anyone that has ever commited a file or a change to Lethe).

@AmishgaAlphonius
@shahabgol
@oguevremont
@Luckabarbeau
@voferreira
@CaroleAnneDaunais
@acdaigneault
@jeannejoachim
@OGaboriault
@hepap
@tonielgeitani
@paulapatience
@PierreLaurentinCS
@ghazalemir
@technophil98
@SGauvin
@bibeauv
@mivaia
@emilebergeron
@cenr20
@OresteMarquis
@charles-lp
@Wendi-L
@Clara-Haydar
@maxl-1
@Wieb-ke
@anicusan
@EduardsBlandin
@yashuuzi
@kronbichler
@bangerth
@Raju1231

[peterrum]

gather an OK from every past and present contributers.

OK from my side 👍

[paulapatience]

OK for me too.

[lpsaavedra]

OK

[bangerth]

I don't even remember contributing, but of course it's ok with me :-)

[blaisb]

I don't even remember contributing, but of course it's ok with me :-)

You did, you fixed a few typos in the README.md file 4 years ago. Everybody's equal, it needs to be fair :)

[voferreira]

Ok

[CaroleAnneDaunais]

Ok ✌

[shahabgol]

Thank you for including me as a contributor :) It's totally OK with me.

…

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 2:46 PM Victor Oliveira Ferreira < ***@***.***> wrote: Ok — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1145 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHBGUDOSWKB3WWCQB7IUUTTZCT5HNAVCNFSM6AAAAABH2THVWGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJVHE3DCMBVGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Regards, Shahab Golshan

[anicusan]

Thanks for including me as a contributor - of course, very happy with the relicensing!

[OresteMarquis]

Ok :)

[ghazalemir]

Ok :)

[oguevremont]

Ok!

[acdaigneault]

Ok!

[kronbichler]

Ok

[OGaboriault]

Ok

[bangerth]

On 5/16/24 12:46, Bruno Blais wrote: You did, you fixed a few typos in the README.md file 4 years ago. Everybody's equal, it needs to be fair :)

My version of "see something say something": See a typo anywhere, write a pull request :-)

[Luckabarbeau]

Ok !

[yashuuzi]

Ok!

[AmishgaAlphonius]

Ok :)

[Wieb-ke]

ok

[PierreLaurentinCS]

Ok for me !

[charles-lp]

Ok for me as well!

[tonielgeitani]

Okay for me  :)

[Clara-Haydar]

Ok :)

…

________________________________ From: Bruno Blais ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 8:43:54 PM To: chaos-polymtl/lethe ***@***.***> Cc: Clara-Haydar ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: [chaos-polymtl/lethe] Relicensing Lethe (Issue #1145) During this week's Hackathon we discussed relicensing for Lethe in order to increase the flexibility of our license and also to remain coherent with the license that is used by deal.II. Deal.II uses a dual license under: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR LGPL-2.1-or-later I propose we use the same license. One of the main target of this issue is to gather an OK from every past and present contributers. @AmishgaAlphonius<https://github.com/AmishgaAlphonius> @shahabgol<https://github.com/shahabgol> @oguevremont<https://github.com/oguevremont> @Luckabarbeau<https://github.com/Luckabarbeau> @voferreira<https://github.com/voferreira> @CaroleAnneDaunais<https://github.com/CaroleAnneDaunais> @acdaigneault<https://github.com/acdaigneault> @jeannejoachim<https://github.com/jeannejoachim> @OGaboriault<https://github.com/OGaboriault> @hepap<https://github.com/hepap> @tonielgeitani<https://github.com/tonielgeitani> @paulapatience<https://github.com/paulapatience> @PierreLaurentinCS<https://github.com/PierreLaurentinCS> @ghazalemir<https://github.com/ghazalemir> @technophil98<https://github.com/technophil98> @SGauvin<https://github.com/SGauvin> @bibeauv<https://github.com/bibeauv> @mivaia<https://github.com/mivaia> @emilebergeron<https://github.com/emilebergeron> @cenr20<https://github.com/cenr20> @OresteMarquis<https://github.com/OresteMarquis> @charles-lp<https://github.com/charles-lp> @Wendi-L<https://github.com/Wendi-L> @Clara-Haydar<https://github.com/Clara-Haydar> @maxl-1<https://github.com/maxl-1> @Wieb-ke<https://github.com/Wieb-ke> @anicusan<https://github.com/anicusan> @EduardsBlandin<https://github.com/EduardsBlandin> @yashuuzi<https://github.com/yashuuzi> @kronbichler<https://github.com/kronbichler> @bangerth<https://github.com/bangerth> @Raju1231<https://github.com/Raju1231> — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1145>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZ6LWIY5FNW6ZIQ5T2233H3ZCT46VAVCNFSM6AAAAABH2THVWGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGMYDAOBZHA4DAMI>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Wendi-L]

Many thanks for including me as a contributor. I fully support the relicensing.

[hepap]

Ok for me :)

[jeannejoachim]

Hi Lethe family! Thank you Bruno for checking that with all of us. I do not know enough about licencing to get what will change specifically from the current LGPL-2.1, but I see Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception is still a free software license (so not a major change on this part), and so I trust deal.II and the current Lethe team judgment about the licence to use 🙂 Have a good day! Jeanne Le ven. 17 mai 2024 à 08:59, hepap ***@***.***> a écrit :

…

Ok for me :) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1145 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARGARBJLOHIIWR5R27C6H63ZCX5KVAVCNFSM6AAAAABH2THVWGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJXGU2TANRUGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[mivaia]

Ok for me!

[SGauvin]

Ok from my side 👋