Nested geometric product error

[eschnett]

julia> @basis 1
(⟨+⟩, v, v₁)

julia> @basis 2
(⟨++⟩, v, v₁, v₂, v₁₂)

julia> A = Chain{V,1}(Chain(v1), Chain(v1))
(1v₁ + 0v₂)v₁ + (1v₁ + 0v₂)v₂

julia> x = Chain(v2)
0v₁ + 1v₂

julia> A ⋅ x
1v₁ + 0v₂

julia> A * x
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2}(::Float64)
Closest candidates are:
  Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2}(::T) where T<:Number at boot.jl:715
  Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2}(::Simplex{V,0,B,T} where T where B) where {V, G, T, X} at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/Grassmann/3DicJ/src/multivectors.jl:44
  Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2}(::Base.TwicePrecision) where T<:Number at twiceprecision.jl:243
  ...
Stacktrace:
 [1] convert(::Type{Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2}}, ::Float64) at ./number.jl:7
 [2] macro expansion at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/StaticArrays/1g9bq/src/util.jl:11 [inlined]
 [3] convert_ntuple at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/StaticArrays/1g9bq/src/util.jl:8 [inlined]
 [4] SArray{Tuple{4},Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2},1,4}(::Tuple{Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2},Float64,Float64,Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2}}) at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/StaticArrays/1g9bq/src/SArray.jl:28
 [5] StaticArray at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/StaticArrays/1g9bq/src/convert.jl:4 [inlined]
 [6] macro expansion at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/Grassmann/3DicJ/src/products.jl:0 [inlined]
 [7] *(::Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2},2}, ::Chain{⟨++⟩,1,Int64,2}) at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/Grassmann/3DicJ/src/products.jl:856
 [8] top-level scope at REPL[67]:1
 [9] eval(::Module, ::Any) at ./boot.jl:331
 [10] eval_user_input(::Any, ::REPL.REPLBackend) at /Users/eschnett/src/julia-1.4/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.4/REPL/src/REPL.jl:86
 [11] run_backend(::REPL.REPLBackend) at /Users/eschnett/.julia/packages/Revise/0meWR/src/Revise.jl:1075
 [12] top-level scope at none:0

[chakravala]

Is this an operation you actually need? I'd rather not spend my free time working on features that are just random test examples and aren't actually used in practice.

I'll look into it, but this issue is not a high priority for anything as far as I currently know.

[eschnett]

No, I don't need this at the moment.