Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

arcface(s=64,m=0.5) Accuracy is worse than Softmax #60

Open
zhanglaplace opened this issue Nov 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

arcface(s=64,m=0.5) Accuracy is worse than Softmax #60

zhanglaplace opened this issue Nov 24, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@zhanglaplace
Copy link

train data:
glint360Datasets(https://github.com/deepinsight/insightface/blob/master/recognition/partial_fc/README.md);
1、 First,train baseline model with R50-Softmax
2、Second,Train ArcFace-Softmax by finetune the backbone using Step1 Backbone model . the acc is lower then origin softmax;
image

@cavalleria
Copy link
Owner

I have not finetuned using arcface, but the result does not seem reasonable.

@zhanglaplace
Copy link
Author

I have not finetuned using arcface, but the result does not seem reasonable.
train stretch using arcface has a better performance ?

@cavalleria
Copy link
Owner

training from scratch using arcface is better than softmax. i think properly finetune on softmax with arcface should better softmax

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants