Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it backward compatible? #12

Closed
dtoxin7 opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Is it backward compatible? #12

dtoxin7 opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@dtoxin7
Copy link

dtoxin7 commented Oct 30, 2020

Hi! Is this fork backward compatible with the binary from original repo? Do the commands and functions that work in the original version also work in this one?

@burningalchemist
Copy link
Owner

burningalchemist commented Oct 31, 2020

@dtoxin7 Yes it is. 👍 There are no breaking changes in commands and functions.
If there's a new approach, implementation or a breaking change, it will be a part of a new project.

The goal of this fork is:

  • maintain the existing approach by original author;
  • improve quality / fix issues / cover with tests;
  • keep up with up-to-date dependencies, good security practices;
  • add some features or configuration parameters if necessary;
  • support users of the sql exporter.

The original project really helped me in my work projects, so I'd like to keep it available for the others. 🙂

@burningalchemist burningalchemist pinned this issue Oct 31, 2020
@dtoxin7
Copy link
Author

dtoxin7 commented Nov 1, 2020

Thanks for your answer!

@burningalchemist burningalchemist changed the title Backward compatible Is it backward compatible? Nov 1, 2020
@burningalchemist burningalchemist added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants