boost::pfr

[xR3b0rn]

Is there any reason why boost::spriti::x3 is not using boost::pfr? If there are concerns about increasements in compiletime or if you do not want have this additional dependency, boost::pfr could be optional (e.g. deactivatable by macro).

[Kojoley]

At the moment sequence handling is built on top of Fusion and highly coupled to it. I was planning to introduce an intermediate layer that could be an extension point to utilize PFR, Hana, and any other tuple-like library.

[denzor200]

Hi, @djowel ! I hope everything fine too.
The current status - everything done on the Fusion side: boostorg/fusion#266
Waiting for review for that PR. And of course it's possible to split the PR to 2 small ones if it's too much for anyone who will provide review. Or I can start working on the same functionality one the Spirit side, if nobody have enough motivation to maintain the Fusion at all.
Let me know what you think what should I do next.

[djowel]

OK, looking at boostorg/fusion#266 seems we are waiting for a review from @daminetreg or someone else?

"@xR3b0rn everything ready from my side, waiting for review. As I informed above, I was unavailable for some months. But right now I'm available every day and can react to review pretty fast."

I'm not sure if I'll have the time to do a review. There's a lot! So yes, breaking it down into smaller PRs will help immensely. It would also be nice if you can ask for others (maybe from the boost list) to do a review?

[denzor200]

OK, looking at boostorg/fusion#266 seems we are waiting for a review from @daminetreg or someone else?

Yes, from @daminetreg

I'm not sure if I'll have the time to do a review. There's a lot! So yes, breaking it down into smaller PRs will help immensely. It would also be nice if you can ask for others (maybe from the boost list) to do a review?

Ok, then later I will split that PR and then ask someone from mail-list for review

[daminetreg]

Yes I apologize, I never came to it, always thought I can do this but was having a hard time making availabilities. I still want to use it and test it in codebases where I rely alot on BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT but am overbusy with work.

[denzor200]

Hi, Damien! Dont worry, everything going to be OK.

BTW, do you know that now PFR can reflect field names? :-)