You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In working group discussions it was decided that there should be no relationship of a respective product to the ProductFamily enumeration. The reason for that was because it was in once sense redundant: the name of the class of the product revealed the family.
That said, "software" has no way of knowing that -- without some form of intelligence.
This proposal is to add that relationship for all products (ManureRecycing, PlantProtection, and so on).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In working group discussions it was decided that there should be no relationship of a respective product to the ProductFamily enumeration. The reason for that was because it was in once sense redundant: the name of the class of the product revealed the family.
That said, "software" has no way of knowing that -- without some form of intelligence.
This proposal is to add that relationship for all products (ManureRecycing, PlantProtection, and so on).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: