-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bitwarden Unified says Organization expired , but it is not #3412
Comments
Same here. I tried uploading the original license file but it did not work. I redownloaded the license file and reuploaded it on my self-hosted instance, then it worked for a few days and it happened the same today again. @florie1706, I'm not sure if I'm on "Bitwarden Unified"... how do you see that? |
I would say self hosted is unified 😉 |
Hi there, I attempted to reproduce your issue and was unable to do so. I think your error could have its origin in a license compatibility issue. Please try updating your instance and applying the latest license from the Bitwarden web vault. If that doesn't resolve it, please contact us using the form below. We use GitHub issues as a place to track bugs and other development related issues. If your issue persists, please write us back using our contact form, so we can continue troubleshooting: https://bitwarden.com/contact/ You can include a link to this issue in the message content. Alternatively, you can also search for an answer in our help documentation (https://bitwarden.com/help/) or get help from other Bitwarden users on our community forums (https://community.bitwarden.com/c/support/). The issue here will be closed. Thanks! |
@sammbw Our company faces the same issue with a self-hosted Bitwarden instance. Happened first on November 2nd after we updated our server to v2023.10.0. Fixed it by re-downloading our org license file from bitwarden.com (which wasn't suspended) and re-uploading it to our installation. November 3rd, the issue reoccurred after updating our server to v2023.10.1. Fixed it again as before. Both times, our organization was suspended although the expiration date of our Enterprise subscription was and still is way in the future. The suspension led to ~200 employees not being able to access any collection, TOTP etc. |
@sammbw I understand that you cannot reproduce it, but it doesn't mean that it is not a bug. Please re-open this issue so that we can work to find out what is going on. |
That is what Bitwarden Support answered this morning ( I reuploaded the newly downloaded license file twice before I opened this issue here). For now it works but it worked before as well for let's say half a day / a day as mentioned by @kolja1507
They speak about a bug ;) |
I guess you are using Docker Compose right? |
Interesting. Did you have |
We neither. |
@GuillaumeHullin Right. |
We neither. |
Trying to find a common point between us... In the link: https://bitwarden.com/help/families-for-enterprise-self-hosted/#step-1-enable-cloud-communication
I do use pfBlocker to filter traffic (IP filtering and DNS blacklist)... both of the above domain work for me but could it be that Bitwarden would make an other external check for license? Do you guys use network filtering? |
As I use a paid Family License I do not have CloudSync enabled, I think I do not need / cannot use it anyways, see here:
There are two methods for doing so, however Families organizations may only update manually: |
@florie1706 same, I use Families organizations. |
Steps To Reproduce
Expected Result
A valid license is provided so it just should work.
Actual Result
Got mail notification that my family organisation is expired, cannot use the data inside the organisation.
Screenshots or Videos
Additional Context
This happens to my family organisation since the image bitwarden/self-host:2023.10.0-beta but also persists in bitwarden/self-host:2023.10.1-beta
Prior that two images I had no issues.
Githash Version
55ecec6-dirty
Environment Details
Database Image
No response
Issue-Link
#2480
Issue Tracking Info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: