Breach of code of conduct

[grctest]

Describe the issue

An active committee member has chosen to abuse their telegram administrative permissions and acted in blatant breach of code of conduct.

To Reproduce

Upset the committee member through use of negative emoji reactions on their (IMO) poor quality community posts; receive bans across multiple telegram channels (even those emojis weren't used in) and receive implicit death threats in public telegram channels where they don't hold administrative permissions to abuse carte blanche.

Expected behavior

Committee members don't breach code of conduct nor implicitly threaten to murder volunteer Bitshares developers.

Don't dish out multiple communication platform bans when personally upset by a single emoji.

Additional context

Any form of death threats, implicit or explicit should be strongly condemned.

Through abuse of channel admin rights, the intended code of conduct method of reporting incidents privately to the project team was rendered impossible. New routes to report incidents privately without use of telegram should be included in the code of conduct document.

Said committee member has as little as 0.04% of total supply as voted support; the network needs to encourage greater participation in creating vote locks and voting for appropriate representatives to guide Bitshares long term. As it stands, a majority of the committee could be ousted with approx $15k locked with the 8x multiplier.

[litepresence]

excommunicado has 3 meanings;

historically - religious separation from the Catholic church, 
commonly, and as I understood, to be cut off from ANY secular group, 
and yes there apparently was some pop culture movie a few years ago where it was a death threat 

the latter is not the case. R, you are awfulizing and musterbating needlessly.
you need to chill the fuck out and get past the cognitive distortion of this petty disagreement

assuming "if not A, it must be C" when in fact it is 3 cases; B most obvious

FACTS: most people these days - especially those in the middle east:

1) are not Catholic 
2) have not seen John Wick movies

therefore you're off in logical fallacy land

besides it makes zero sense that a doxxxed individual would choose to threaten the life of an anon
besides he's Arabic as first language and location, and I'm US English native I've never even heard of the movie series John Wick until now.
besides you have zero legal grounds for "reasonable apprehension of fear of imminent harm" therefore the claim is defamation

I have seen to it you can join @bitsharesDEV telegram again.

collect yourself and promptly delete all the nonsense about death threats from community github and forums

[grctest]

and yes there apparently was some pop culture movie a few years ago where it was a death threat

Yes, the most relevant meaning in the bitshares community is this definition.

2. have not seen John Wick movies

I seriously doubt that, there's now 4 john wick movies, all have launched in both America and EMEA.

you need to chill the fuck out and get past the cognitive distortion of this petty disagreement

Too late for that.

besides you have zero legal grounds for "reasonable apprehension of fear of imminent harm" therefore the claim is defamation

Nonsense, we're talking about an implicit threat not an explicit direct actionable threat. Get a grip and follow the code of conduct properly.

If you want to scrub this incident from the internet then contact the forum moderator to do so. Your request that I delete the content is not in line with the code of conduct enforcement section, adhere to the code of conduct properly.

If they didn't want to have record of their 'perceived' behaviour on github then they shouldn't have acted in the manner they did. Google big confusing words before you use them to destroy dev relations.

[grctest]

@litepresence He's repeated his calls for me to die, and now has become an outspoken supporter of a banned "hate group".

Can you really say there's any from of code of conduct being enforced? If not, back the PR: #3688