Support .NET Standard 2.0?

[JimSEOW]

Is there a plan to support .NET Standard 2.0 to bring this library to UWP APP?

[benoit74]

Unfortunately no. Mostly because .Net Standard is too slow for rendering complex graphics compared to raw OpenGL/ 2017-08-06 1:19 GMT+02:00 JimSEOW <[email protected]>:

…

Is there a plan to support .NET Standard 2.0 to bring this library to UWP APP? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGxeiZ4F4DJkffCV_a1e6bw08Wl_qeIRks5sVPiOgaJpZM4Oulwb> .

[JimSEOW]

@benoit74 thanks for responding.
The .NET library is great. It is based on OpenGL (OpenTK).

I hope eventually it is possible to migrate from OpenTK to OpenES 3.2 (Microsoft Angle) that will makes your library Cross platform to UWP with XAML InterOperability.

[benoit74]

Seems feasible ... but no idea when Thanks for the pointer anyway, never met this before (but I have to admit that I'm a bit away from .Net recently) 2017-08-08 23:53 GMT+02:00 JimSEOW <[email protected]>:

…

@benoit74 <https://github.com/benoit74> thanks for responding. The .NET library is great. It is based on OpenGL (OpenTK). I hope eventually it is possible to migrate from OpenTK to OpenES 3.2 (Microsoft Angle) <https://github.com/luca-piccioni/OpenGL.Net> that will makes your library Cross platform to UWP with XAML InterOperability. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGxeiSl5_XlRi9lopH4cwqiMzOXih578ks5sWNjcgaJpZM4Oulwb> .

[JimSEOW]

@benoit74 We need to democratize 3D chart for .NET through XAML Standard for 3D. Curious of your view.