-
Describe the bugWhen I have the Expected BehaviorIf the Current BehaviorThe Reproduction Steps
Possible SolutionNo response Additional Information/ContextNo response AWS .NET SDK and/or Package version used<PackageReference Include="AWSSDK.Core" Version="3.7.8.10" />
<PackageReference Include="AWSSDK.EC2" Version="3.7.61" />
<PackageReference Include="AWSSDK.Extensions.NETCore.Setup" Version="3.7.2" />
<PackageReference Include="AWSSDK.SecretsManager" Version="3.7.2.18" /> Targeted .NET Platformnet6.0 Operating System and versionWindows 10 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
@rcdailey Thanks for reporting the issue. The issue related to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @rcdailey thanks for reaching out. In the documentation that you linked to, it does mention how Windows uses So this is the expected behavior. Since this isn’t a bug, I’m going to convert the issue into a Discussion per our guidance process. Please let us know if you have any follow up questions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@tim-finnigan First of all, I think this should have been left as an issue until both sides agree. Furthermore setting your own response as the answer is also not that helpful IMHO. I'm not upset or anything, I just feel like the way my bug report is being handled is rather dismissive. More on topic: Something is absolutely broken, because you have a tool that writes to one location and an API that reads from another. The implementations are not consistent. At this point, I'm asserting the library is behaving correctly and the Please check my link one more time. Specifically note that it says the following (emphasis is mine):
Note that number 1 should happen first, that is, that Please reconsider moving this back to an issue and wait for both sides to agree on the conclusion before hastily migrating things to discussions. Thank you for your quick response! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@tim-finnigan First of all, I think this should have been left as an issue until both sides agree. Furthermore setting your own response as the answer is also not that helpful IMHO. I'm not upset or anything, I just feel like the way my bug report is being handled is rather dismissive.
More on topic: Something is absolutely broken, because you have a tool that writes to one location and an API that reads from another. The implementations are not consistent. At this point, I'm asserting the library is behaving correctly and the
aws
tool is broken.Please check my link one more time. Specifically note that it says the following (emphasis is mine):