New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow different patterns for the t.try()
callback argument
#273
Labels
Comments
I would also allow |
Yes. Looks like you're agreed with the other patterns so then we need to add support for all of these. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
avajs/ava#1947 landed a new
t.try()
assertion. It's experimental, one of the reasons for which is that it advocates some new usages of AVA that this plugin rejects.t.try()
takes a callback, which receives another execution object:Not all linting setups allow you to shadow variables like this. I'm proposing we also allow
tt
, andt1
throught9
. Thoughts?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: