New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bug: asdf update --head
odd behavior
#1515
Labels
Comments
@hyperupcall Some items you list I was midway through addressing with #1437
This was one case I had not thought of testing against. I will push my latest changes to this PR and tag you for review to get your thoughts. |
Sounds good 👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the Bug
Currently
asdf update --head
has a few incorrect underlying assumptions (command-update.bash
)master
is default branch (these days more people are configuring Git to usemain
by default)origin
(command breaks on rename)"asdf update --head should checkout the master branch"
test consistenly breaks when it is ran from a branch other thanmaster
Steps to Reproduce
bats test
,asdf update --head
Expected Behaviour
A
main
branch with configured upstream remoteme
properly is updated to latestasdf
HEADActual Behaviour
master
gets createdEnvironment
asdf plugins affected (if relevant)
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: