Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NASTY! - Preview position is way off when editing long documents #459 #641

Open
newbie-02 opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@newbie-02
Copy link

It' a very nasty point that edit and preview loose sync in long documents or
documents with includes, but handling in # 459 seems somewhat dead.

It's a 4.5 year old serious shortcoming, and no progress!

Set yourself in a position where you have started some long documents
without having been warned, you also use includes for structuring of
common parts, and the longer the documents become you waste more
and more of your valuable time in finding in edit window what is shown
in preview, and when edited have stupid search again how it looks in
preview, and never know / ever have to recheck where in the document
you are,

But switching to another program would be tedious too.

thus more and more you become ineffective and think 'better if I'd never
started with this sh... ', but you are trapped.

Sorry for the harsh words, whoever thinks to use AsciidocFX: Either
decide to work without preview, or to work without includes,
or use another program!

@rahmanusta
Copy link
Member

Hi, please don’t create fake accounts to write a comment. I work on the issue and I hope in next release there will be a better way to handle synchronization between editor and preview

@newbie-02
Copy link
Author

hi, thanks for caring, I don't know about any fake accounts, I feel bad opening a new issue for this, but after three months without an answer I was desperate ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants