Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Design Draft] Eindistance #248

Open
arogozhnikov opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[Design Draft] Eindistance #248

arogozhnikov opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@arogozhnikov
Copy link
Owner

arogozhnikov commented Mar 23, 2023

One common scenario that can benefit from einsum-like notation, but seemingly was not implemented is computation of pairwise distances.

This draft covers how this functionality may look like in einops.

Example

distances_bthw = eindistance(x_btc, x_bhwc, 'b t c, b h w c -> b t h w', distance='sq_euclid')

In this example distance is computed as a norm over reduced variable c.

Function resembles einsum, but there are several differences:

  • no trivially reduced axes (i.e. axes present in only one of inputs)
  • always two inputs
  • choice of distance
  • for simplicity and for all practical cases we can assume that only one variable is reduced.

Backend support

cdist. scipy has a cdist function (also replicas in cupy/jax), which does not cover batching (which is super-common in DL code). pytorch has cdist with batching (different interface)

Implementation issues

Trivial implementation (computing difference, taking norm over reduced dimension) is simple to implement, but suffers from inefficiency and a large memory consumption.

More efficient approaches available that are highly specific to commonly used norms (euclid, cosine).
However both have some issues with precision (e.g. fast sq_euclid can be negative, and same with cosine).

Named issues may be exaggerated by usage of float16 / bfloat16

No ETA.

@arogozhnikov arogozhnikov added the enhancement New feature or request label May 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant