Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better integration with Zotero #1363

Open
raffaem opened this issue Apr 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Better integration with Zotero #1363

raffaem opened this issue Apr 25, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@raffaem
Copy link
Contributor

raffaem commented Apr 25, 2023

There are some differences from the field exported by Zotero (at least the BetterBibTex plugin) and the ones al-folio expects:

  1. Zotero exports journaltitle and shortjournal, while al-folio expects journal
  2. Zotero only exports date (ISO 8601 format, e.g. "2023-07-01"), while al-folio expects a year
  3. Zotero exports url, while al-folio expects pdf
@george-gca
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't know how much of this would be opinionated, or if it is a standard. For example, this could better support Zotero, but make it worse for Mendeley (personally I don't use any for citations). Also many conferences vary in citation styles.

@CheariX
Copy link
Contributor

CheariX commented Nov 3, 2023

I stumbled on this issue when upgrading from v0.9 to v0.10.x.
In v0.9, date was working flawlessly for me.
Due to the new group_by behavior, the date field is no longer working. al-folio now expects a year field.

My Solution was to tell Zotero to use the Better Bibtex instead of the Better BibLaTex format. The former one uses year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants