Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Enhancement]: List of Ereader devices should include access level #2991

Closed
ZLoth opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

[Enhancement]: List of Ereader devices should include access level #2991

ZLoth opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ZLoth
Copy link

ZLoth commented May 19, 2024

Type of Enhancement

Web Interface/Frontend

Describe the Feature/Enhancement

When setting up a e-reader device, there are several access levels available:

  • Admin users only
  • All users including guests
  • All users excluding guests
  • Specific Users

image

However, when you display the list of devices, the associated access level isn't being displayed, and you have to edit the device to view the access level.

image

Why would this be helpful?

It would make ereader administration easier in AudioBookShelf.

Future Implementation (Screenshot)

image

Audiobookshelf Server Version

2.9.0

Current Implementation (Screenshot)

image
@ZLoth ZLoth added the enhancement New feature or request label May 19, 2024
@nichwall nichwall mentioned this issue May 25, 2024
Merged
@advplyr advplyr added the awaiting release Issue is resolved and will be in the next release label May 25, 2024
@advplyr
Copy link
Owner

advplyr commented May 27, 2024

Updated in v2.10.0

@advplyr advplyr closed this as completed May 27, 2024
@advplyr advplyr removed the awaiting release Issue is resolved and will be in the next release label May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ZLoth @advplyr