Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Skip-Ad media session action #350

Open
jiajiabingcheng opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Support Skip-Ad media session action #350

jiajiabingcheng opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
topic: media Spec relates to audio, video, or other timed media venue: W3C Media WG

Comments

@jiajiabingcheng
Copy link

jiajiabingcheng commented May 15, 2024

WebKittens

@youennf, @jernoble

Title of the spec

Support Skip-Ad media session action

URL to the spec

https://www.w3.org/TR/mediasession/#dom-mediasessionaction-skipad

URL to the spec's repository

https://github.com/w3c/mediasession

Issue Tracker URL

No response

Explainer URL

https://developer.chrome.com/blog/media-updates-in-chrome-73#skipad
w3c/mediasession#203 (comment)

TAG Design Review URL

w3ctag/design-reviews#957

Mozilla standards-positions issue URL

mozilla/standards-positions#1026

WebKit Bugzilla URL

No response

Radar URL

No response

Description

This feature was initially proposed and implemented four years ago but remained disabled due to a lack of practical use cases. It already received LGTM from the Blink dev group back in February 2019. Given our team's plan to implement a feature related to this action, we are now proposing to enable it.

@beaufortfrancois
Copy link

cc @youennf

@beaufortfrancois
Copy link

FYI w3c/mediasession#203 (comment)

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres added the topic: media Spec relates to audio, video, or other timed media label May 18, 2024
@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if it might be more effective to rip this out of the spec, and then send it as PR for us to discuss in the Media WG?

If the feature didn't have implementer consensus, then it probably shouldn't have been added to the spec in the first place, right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: media Spec relates to audio, video, or other timed media venue: W3C Media WG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants