Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trouble achieving results in paper #10

Open
0k9d0h1 opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Trouble achieving results in paper #10

0k9d0h1 opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@0k9d0h1
Copy link

0k9d0h1 commented Apr 23, 2024

Hello, I attempted to replicate the results of the DAS baseline using your code, but encountered discrepancies with the results presented in the paper. I posttrained the model with a batch size of 16 due to resource limitations, while the README file suggests a batch size of 62. Below are the F1 scores and accuracies obtained:

Acc:
0.8679 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.8246 0.0000 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.8246 0.6880 0.0000
0.8616 0.7387 0.6889 0.8246 0.6880 0.8051

F1:
0.7925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.7909 0.0000 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.7909 0.6880 0.0000
0.7858 0.7002 0.5529 0.7909 0.6880 0.6751

Could the discrepancy be related to the difference in batch size, or am I missing something else? Your insights would be appreciated. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant