New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Citation] v1.0.0 or v1.2.0? #2333
Comments
Hi @ego-thales Thank you for the great feedback. The title of the paper is including 1.0.0, therefore we suggest adapting the title in the citation. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For citing this repo, we're given the following bibitem.
But the url actually points to an article on
v1.0.0
. I actually couldn't find any article onv1.2.0
.I would like to understand if this is a typo of some sort, or if I simply missed something.
Thanks for the great work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: