-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lora ignored on batch count > 1 #242
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
Specthram
changed the title
lora strength looks forced tp 1.0 at batch count > 1
lora strength looks forced to 1.0 on batch count > 1 images
Mar 30, 2024
Specthram
changed the title
lora strength looks forced to 1.0 on batch count > 1 images
lora strength looks forced to 1.0 on batch count > 1
Mar 30, 2024
Specthram
changed the title
lora strength looks forced to 1.0 on batch count > 1
lora strength looks modified on batch count > 1
Apr 1, 2024
Specthram
changed the title
lora strength looks modified on batch count > 1
lora ignored on batch count > 1
Apr 2, 2024
I just found a work around if it can help to fix : I used https://lorainfo.tools/ to rename the lora |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Due diligence
Describe the bug
(edited : it just ignores loras)
Hello,
When I'm generating txt2img images, I use Loras. The picture is like what i want. If the batch size is set for example to 6, all images are similar. Ok.
But when I set batch count to 2, despite the png info saying that the loras are still there, the second and above pictures batch looks like it is ignoring the loras (with every batch size).
Am i missing something ?
I tried batch_count_method safe and unify, it does not resolve my issue. It's weird
I tried without unprompted, and it works fine my loras activated on all batch > 1.
I tried with [civitai], same issue.
Prompt
No response
Log output
No response
Unprompted version
10.8.0
WebUI version
1.8.0
Other comments
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: