Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wall Loops number Override Bridge and cause failiure. #5376

Open
3 tasks done
lhndo opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 7 comments
Open
3 tasks done

Wall Loops number Override Bridge and cause failiure. #5376

lhndo opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@lhndo
Copy link

lhndo commented May 15, 2024

Is there an existing issue for this problem?

  • I have searched the existing issues

OrcaSlicer Version

2.0.0

Operating System (OS)

Windows

OS Version

Windows 10

Additional system information

No response

Printer

LH Stinger

How to reproduce

Slice model attached
Look at the bridging on the fan ducts.
The more perimeters you have, the worse it is. Works with only one 😹

Actual results

Perimeters floating instead proper supported bridge lines
2024_05_15_5489_orca-slicer
2024_05_15_5490_orca-slicer

Expected results

Internal bridges are anchored properly. Perimeters not printed in air when the bridge can expand to a solid point underneath.

Project file & Debug log uploads

bridge error toolhead.zip

Checklist of files to include

  • Log file
  • Project file

Anything else?

No response

@lhndo lhndo added the bug Something isn't working label May 15, 2024
@lhndo
Copy link
Author

lhndo commented May 15, 2024

Some more examples of perimeters "growing" into the bridge area
image
With one wall the bridge can actually bridge
image

@lhndo
Copy link
Author

lhndo commented May 15, 2024

Impossible Cube.zip
2024_05_15_5497_bambu-studio

Curious if anyone can make a successful bridge layer (independent of model rotation) )when setting the perimeters above 5 on this impossible model.

@discip
Copy link
Contributor

discip commented May 16, 2024

I know it's not a real solution, but as a temporary workaround you could change the Walls printing order to Outer/Inner.

@lhndo
Copy link
Author

lhndo commented May 16, 2024

That could work if would be possible to print perimeters at 90 degrees in the air. The perimeters will still be printed in air with support only on the lateral side. They would also probably not stick since they won't have compression to expand into the adjacent perimeter.

@buzzhuzz
Copy link
Contributor

@lhndo, another workaround may be enabling "Bridge counterbore holes" to either partially bridged or sacrificial layer:
Screenshot from 2024-05-17 05-11-10

However, this might compromise part strength if your wall is too thin and bridge density (or flow) less than 100% as vertical wall will be fully covered by the bridge layer added:
Screenshot from 2024-05-17 05-11-25

@lhndo
Copy link
Author

lhndo commented May 17, 2024

@buzzhuzz that's a good trick! I managed to do something similar in SuperSlicer by using custom settings and bridge orientation. That only worked in one direction sadly.


Unfortunately, for me, it doesn't apply in the original case.
The main point for the latter example was to create a simple test case to illustrate the original issue, and maybe help the testing process if anyone has a go at tackling this issue.


In my case I have a dozen variations of this toolhead, which is used for the LH Stinger, and are being printed by other people.

@lhndo
Copy link
Author

lhndo commented May 19, 2024

Another example of the same issue:
2024_05_19_5532_orca-slicer

IMG_0620

2024_05_19_5533_orca-slicer

tensioner error.zip

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants