Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thermal boundary condition #721

Open
Tissot11 opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Thermal boundary condition #721

Tissot11 opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
feature-request something that could be added to the code

Comments

@Tissot11
Copy link

I was curious to know the reason why thermal boundary condition complains about the relativistic temperatures when one could initialize plasma species using relativistic temperatures in Smilei and also particle injectors seem to be capable of doing it. So why there is an issue with the thermal boundary condition and relativistic temperatures?

@Tissot11 Tissot11 added the feature-request something that could be added to the code label May 24, 2024
@Tissot11 Tissot11 changed the title Thermal boundary velocity Thermal boundary condition May 24, 2024
@mccoys
Copy link
Contributor

mccoys commented Jun 3, 2024

I don't think there is a particular issue with relativistic temperature at the boundary other than that it has not been developed in the boundary conditions.

@Tissot11
Copy link
Author

Tissot11 commented Jun 3, 2024

Ok. Just to let you know in connection to the closed issue #704 that indeed there are subtle issues with newer version of Smilei, intel MPI and OpenMPI libraries. I have managed to avoid sometimes these segmentation faults using older version of Smilei < 5.0 but if I enable options like Field Filtering, I see segmentations faults all the time on different HPC facilities using different MPI libraries.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request something that could be added to the code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants