Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different result about Transfer Learning #52

Open
StylesZhang opened this issue Jul 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Different result about Transfer Learning #52

StylesZhang opened this issue Jul 22, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@StylesZhang
Copy link

@yyou1996 Hi! I've repeated the experiment of transfer learning using bio dataset, runing the finetune.sh by default setting. I get the result about 0.6531 and 0.6507(test easy and hard), while table 5 in your paper states that GraphCL could reach 0.6788... I'm wondering why I can't reach that score?
Here is my environment:
torch: 1.4.0
torch-cluster:1.5.2
torch-geometric:1.0.3
torch-scatter: 2.0.3
torch-sparse:0.5.1
torch-spline-conv: 1.2.0
I fix the function of scatter_add() of torch-geometric and delete the parameter 'fill-value', as I use the older version of torch-geometric. Otherwise it could cause Runtime Error. 'fill-value' is no longer supported for torch-scatter in version >= 2.0.0. But I guess it's not the main reason that I can't get good experiment result?

@yyou1996
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @HeyMercer,

Would you might take a try with lr=1e-4/1e-2 in https://github.com/Shen-Lab/GraphCL/blob/master/transferLearning_MoleculeNet_PPI/bio/finetune.sh?

@StylesZhang
Copy link
Author

Hi @HeyMercer,

Would you might take a try with lr=1e-4/1e-2 in https://github.com/Shen-Lab/GraphCL/blob/master/transferLearning_MoleculeNet_PPI/bio/finetune.sh?

Thanks, I'll try!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants