Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to fetch destinations from a specific BTP subaccount different from the current one? #3626

Open
ptesny opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@ptesny
Copy link

ptesny commented Mar 7, 2023

How do I tell cloud-sdk to go and fetch destinations from a specific BTP subaccount and different from the one used for users authentication ?

@ptesny ptesny added the question Further information is requested label Mar 7, 2023
@marikaner
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think this is currently intended in the SAP Cloud SDK. You can change the selection strategy and adjust whether to use the subscriber or provider. I assume this is not enough for your case?
Could you please describe your use case?

@ptesny
Copy link
Author

ptesny commented Mar 7, 2023

@marikaner, indeed, as you have guessed, my use case is not a classic multi-tenancy one-to-many relationship, with a single instance of a provider and multiple subscribers (consumers, data sources, etc);

What I am aiming at is to be able to share a number static resources (destinations, html5 repo, cloud connectors) that reside or are hooked into a single master BTP subaccount among a number of providers for enhanced resilience.
There can of course be mutlitenancy for each of the providers....and consumers can subscribe to multiple providers as well;

What I would like to have is a shared and static pool of destinations....and if dynamic changes were required then the off-spring destinations would be set up on the fly as instance level or inline destinations....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants