-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can FLAME estimate eyeball rotation when only using landmarks for fitting? #33
Comments
You are right, estimating eye gaze by optimizing FLAME's eyeball pose parameters requires additional landmarks for the pupil center. If you are using a landmark predictor that provides pupil center locations, one can easily add the distance between FLAME's projected pupil center and the predicted pupil locations (i.e., same as the existing landmark loss but for an additional pair of points) as additional loss and optimize for FLAME's eyeball parameters. |
Thank you! I will give it a try. |
I would like to do something similar not for eyes but like add a few more known landmarks. Were you able to add it? Is so can you share steps or code to do the same? |
Flame has the parameters which can control eyeball rotation. But I saw that the landmark used for flame fitting doesn't include pupil center which may make it impossible to estimate eyeball rotation parameters only from landmarks?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: