Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ImageFap gallery URLs changed, ripper requires update to match new format #2022

Open
sleepingforest2008 opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@sleepingforest2008
Copy link

  • Ripme version:

  • Java version: 20.0.1 2023-04-18

  • Operating system: Windows OS Build 19044.2846

  • Exact URL you were trying to rip when the problem occurred: https://www.imagefap.com/gallery/4590822

  • Please include any additional information about how to reproduce the problem: Run by clicking on .jar file.

Expected Behavior

Expected crawling through links to download, the correct links are formatted as:

  1. https://www.imagefap.com/photo/264876653/?pgid=&gid=4590822&page=0#0
  2. https://www.imagefap.com/photo/264876653/?pgid=&gid=4590822&page=0#1

Appears as though there is a new unique ID associated with the album, in addition to the GID.

Actual Behavior

Attempts to download at URL "https://www.imagefap.com/gallery.php?gid=4590822&view=2", which redirects to the top thumbnail overview of the gallery.

@Muther11-cyber
Copy link

Muther11-cyber commented Jul 1, 2023

I found exactly the same problem

@Muther11-cyber
Copy link

I found out why ImageFap is nolonger worker. The Admin posted this:

"Bandwidth (data signal being sent to you from us) is our 2nd most expensive part of running the site. And 2 years ago or so, when the pandemic came, people were mass downloading pictures like mad crazy. Full galleries all the time by many users. Since this is a free site we had to do something to keep costs down.

Bulk Image Downloader, Download The All and other programs like that were fairly easy to detect on our end. Anyway, we did make changes on the site to stop the mass downloading and keep bandwidth costs down.

What we did isn't perfect. But the changes worked out pretty well. So that's it. Some people had to "mess around" and ruin it for everyone else."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants