-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discussion: Remove verbs for now #55
Comments
@Nudin what is your stance on this? |
Not sure if such a property would work out and be accepted, but remove them if you want. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, I suggest we remove matching verbs for now. The reason is that we need to first create a good structure in the Qitems to handle the verbs. I'm about to propose a new property "verbform of " or "action of" that could link e.g. from light "to light" -> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9128 (light)
I am going to create a script that semi-automatically creates all the verb forms Q-items AND link them similarly to MachtSinn to the lexeme on an existing or new sense. Its gonna work on all the verb lexemes in the database missing a sense or a sense but no P5137.
This means MachtSinn can focus on all the other forms and ignore verbs as they are mostly missing QIDs. WDYT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: