Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Techstack-beta] Site-wide: Secondary font not used where it was #1303

Closed
samueldr opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1319
Closed

[Techstack-beta] Site-wide: Secondary font not used where it was #1303

samueldr opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1319
Assignees
Labels
design About the design refresh work new-techstack-beta This tag marks issues with the new tech stack during preview phase

Comments

@samueldr
Copy link
Member

samueldr commented Mar 4, 2024

At many locations, the fonts used are not the correct ones for the design.

I might have missed a few. So while self-reviewing your work, keep an eye out.

In addition, it would be missing the ones that should apply to the manuals and related writings. (#1251)


Site-wide

Page titles

image

Footer sections

image


Homepage

Announcement banner

image

Example titles

image


Download

Current version text

image


Community

Some(?) second level titles

image

Call-out banner

image

Conference names

image

Countries

image


Donate

Subtitles

image

Acknowledgements

image

@samueldr samueldr added the design About the design refresh work label Mar 4, 2024
@thilobillerbeck thilobillerbeck added the new-techstack-beta This tag marks issues with the new tech stack during preview phase label Mar 6, 2024
@garbas garbas linked a pull request Mar 7, 2024 that will close this issue
@garbas garbas closed this as completed Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
design About the design refresh work new-techstack-beta This tag marks issues with the new tech stack during preview phase
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants