-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AC Tool removes group association with custom group on AEM 6.5 #520
Comments
This is expected and documented in https://github.com/Netcentric/accesscontroltool/blob/develop/docs/AdvancedFeatures.md#configure-unmanaged-aspects. |
@kwin Thanks for the link to the documentation.
If yes, I did try the same on my local, but didn't work. Also, this is not the case with Users. If an AEM user inherits from ACTool managed group, then it will persists the same always, after deployment as well. |
defaultUnmanaged* is not supported within group_config but only within global_config (https://github.com/Netcentric/accesscontroltool/blob/develop/docs/AdvancedFeatures.md#configure-memberships-oftowards-externally-managed-groups)
This is expected, citing from https://github.com/Netcentric/accesscontroltool/blob/develop/docs/AdvancedFeatures.md#configure-unmanaged-aspects
|
Hello,
We’re using Netcentric AC Tool release 2.5.3 to manage custom permissions in our AEM 6.5 project.
We recently ran into an issue where group association with custom group is getting removed automatically after the build.
Steps to reproduce :
Now, deploy the code into AEM again, may be with no changes at all. Just a simple deployment.
Exepected result : media-agency will still be associated to test-group.
Actual result : media-agency is no longer associated to the test-group.
This isn't the same behaviour of group association with user. Group association with user will be persisted even after multiple deployments to the server.
Tried adding keepExistingMembershipsForGroupNamesRegEx: .* into the yaml file as well but didn't work as expected.
Any insights on how do I make it work for group associations? or is this a bug that needs to be addressed?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Hiral Shah
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: