You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue follows discussion #906 , where @prith-gs pointed out that the TurbOPark model is not correctly adding turbulence to the wake (even when running with the Crespo-Hernandez turbulence model). I believe the issue stems from this TODO item. Essentially, the area_overlap computed in the turbopark_solver is all zeros, so the subsequent lines that compute the wake added turbulence also produce zeros.
which is simply the ambient turbulence intensity at both turbines.
Expected output
According to the Crespo-Hernandez turbulence model, we'd expect that the turbulence intensity at the downstream turbine would be higher than the ambient turbulence intensity, i.e.
This issue follows discussion #906 , where @prith-gs pointed out that the TurbOPark model is not correctly adding turbulence to the wake (even when running with the Crespo-Hernandez turbulence model). I believe the issue stems from this TODO item. Essentially, the
area_overlap
computed in theturbopark_solver
is all zeros, so the subsequent lines that compute the wake added turbulence also produce zeros.Steps to reproduce
produces
which is simply the ambient turbulence intensity at both turbines.
Expected output
According to the Crespo-Hernandez turbulence model, we'd expect that the turbulence intensity at the downstream turbine would be higher than the ambient turbulence intensity, i.e.
with
a
> 0.06.Related
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: