We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The number of specs being run locally varies per run:
$ bundle exec rspec Randomized with seed 33336 [...] Finished in 0.76282 seconds (files took 0.36278 seconds to load) 1155 examples, 0 failures
$ bundle exec rspec Randomized with seed 24062 [...] Finished in 0.69801 seconds (files took 0.36089 seconds to load) 1070 examples, 0 failures
$ bundle exec rspec Randomized with seed 60919 [...] Finished in 10.19 seconds (files took 0.35574 seconds to load) 132 examples, 0 failures
Using the same seed for RSpec gives the same number of specs:
$ be rspec --seed 60919 Randomized with seed 60919 [...] Finished in 10.18 seconds (files took 0.37901 seconds to load) 132 examples, 0 failures
It could be a spec exiting early? I haven't checked.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The problem
The number of specs being run locally varies per run:
Using the same seed for RSpec gives the same number of specs:
$ be rspec --seed 60919 Randomized with seed 60919 [...] Finished in 10.18 seconds (files took 0.37901 seconds to load) 132 examples, 0 failures
It could be a spec exiting early? I haven't checked.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: