-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Request to support strongly typed keys efficiently or using generics #331
Comments
dev...Jmerk523:generics_and_fixes |
This might be something I'd consider in a future version, it would break the APIs though and would also require serialization on the key for distributed caches (which is why I didn't want to do that) |
Love the library and use it all the time. Will you be introducing strongly typed keys, even if its for a subset of cache providers with limited support? Conversion of objects into string keys e.g. Type or Enum is a pretty expensive option when a strongly typed generic would be more efficient.
I understand the limitations of supporting multiple cache providers, but want to ask the question anyway to get your thoughts please.
Keep up the good work,
B.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: