Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create identify() calls implementation that helps MixPanel #24368

Open
9 tasks
hjetpoluru opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
9 tasks

Create identify() calls implementation that helps MixPanel #24368

hjetpoluru opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@hjetpoluru
Copy link
Contributor

What is this about?

TBD

We need more of the identify() at 3 key points: registration/signup, login. and app open/foreground(if users can re-open the app in a logged in state)

Comments by Rishi Patel from the MixPanel team.

 If you already have identify() calls placed in the correct areas of your implementation then there shouldn't be any changes needed. In general we recommend calling identify() at 3 key points: registration/signup, login. and app open/foreground(if users can re-open the app in a logged in state). This also all depends on your identity management set up but ultimately you want to make the call at the point where you want to assign an anonymous user your own internal identifier.

Image

Scenario

No response

Design

No response

Technical Details

No response

Threat Modeling Framework

No response

Acceptance Criteria

No response

Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged

  • Engineering (needed in most cases)
  • Design
  • Product
  • QA (automation tests are required to pass before merging PRs but not all changes are covered by automation tests - please review if QA is needed beyond automation tests)
  • Security
  • Legal
  • Marketing
  • Management (please specify)
  • Other (please specify)

References

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant