Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH topic/term/tag analysis #476

Open
2 of 3 tasks
hauten opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Open
2 of 3 tasks

GH topic/term/tag analysis #476

hauten opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hauten
Copy link
Contributor

hauten commented Dec 1, 2020

The Computing external website (computing.llnl.gov) is undergoing a major design & IA overhaul in FY21. It has a new taxonomy of 90+ terms that will be used to relate content to each other. The taxonomy was developed with Computing SMEs.

@IanLee1521 and I discussed comparing our GH tags -- those that drive the software.llnl.gov category browse & those we recommend to aid in repo discoverability -- to the new Comp taxonomy to find overlaps and/or opportunities for streamlining our vocabulary.

  • Compare portal terms to Comp terms (ask me for LLNL-only OneDrive access to the spreadsheet, "Portal vs Comp compare" tab)
  • Update portal tag list based on that initial pass (PR Update category readme #475)
  • TBD

What do we want to do with this information? How much do we care that our GH terms aren't exactly the same as those on Comp? Example: compiler vs compiler technology

(A future Comp feature may leverage the GH API to pull in repo release or download information for open source projects that are featured on the Comp website. The Comp web team has not discussed doing anything with GH topics.)

@hauten hauten self-assigned this Dec 1, 2020
@IanLee1521
Copy link
Member

Is there a plan to make public the taxomony for the Computing site? It would be another good page to link to.

Failing that, perhaps we could statically copy the list to our page in #475 ?

@hauten
Copy link
Contributor Author

hauten commented Dec 2, 2020

The Comp taxonomy will be exposed on browse pages and individual nodes; there won't be a single page listing all the terms, at least not at launch. I need to think about this some more...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants