Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider background licenses redeemer #3096

Open
8 tasks done
JustArchi opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
8 tasks done

Consider background licenses redeemer #3096

JustArchi opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 👀 Evaluation Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered. ⚪ No priority Issues marked with this label are not being actively worked on for time being. 🙏 Wishlist Issues marked with this label are wishlisted. We'd like to make them happen but they're not crucial.

Comments

@JustArchi
Copy link
Member

JustArchi commented Dec 11, 2023

Checklist

Enhancement purpose

We already have BGR for keys, it might make sense to implement BLR as well 🤔

Solution

We should consider extracting common bits from BGR into generic implementation, then re-implement BGR as well as BLR on top of it. We should probably also consider adding commands for both.

Why currently available solutions are not sufficient?

This would allow people to schedule licenses for activation, and also make it easier for plugins dealing with license keys (e.g. @Citrinate plugin https://github.com/Citrinate/FreePackages)

Can you help us with this enhancement idea?

Yes, I can code the solution myself and send a pull request

Additional info

I'm not yet sure what to think of it, so this is currently under evaluation, but I'm positive for now.

@JustArchi JustArchi added ✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🙏 Wishlist Issues marked with this label are wishlisted. We'd like to make them happen but they're not crucial. 👀 Evaluation Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered. labels Dec 11, 2023
@JustArchi JustArchi added the ⚪ No priority Issues marked with this label are not being actively worked on for time being. label Apr 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 👀 Evaluation Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered. ⚪ No priority Issues marked with this label are not being actively worked on for time being. 🙏 Wishlist Issues marked with this label are wishlisted. We'd like to make them happen but they're not crucial.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant