Consider background licenses redeemer #3096
Labels
✨ Enhancement
Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features.
👀 Evaluation
Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered.
⚪ No priority
Issues marked with this label are not being actively worked on for time being.
🙏 Wishlist
Issues marked with this label are wishlisted. We'd like to make them happen but they're not crucial.
Checklist
Enhancement purpose
We already have BGR for keys, it might make sense to implement BLR as well 🤔
Solution
We should consider extracting common bits from BGR into generic implementation, then re-implement BGR as well as BLR on top of it. We should probably also consider adding commands for both.
Why currently available solutions are not sufficient?
This would allow people to schedule licenses for activation, and also make it easier for plugins dealing with license keys (e.g. @Citrinate plugin https://github.com/Citrinate/FreePackages)
Can you help us with this enhancement idea?
Yes, I can code the solution myself and send a pull request
Additional info
I'm not yet sure what to think of it, so this is currently under evaluation, but I'm positive for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: