You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have encountered an issue while using your tool and analyzing the output data.site_proba.csv file. It appears the transcript_position values reported in the output are off by 1 compared to the actual position of the m6A sites.
For example, one row in the data.site_proba.csv file is:
ENST00000361453.3,716,28,0.3540786206722260,TGACT,0.2142857142857143
However, the actual position of the A should be 717, not 716.
I wanted to confirm if this observation is correct, is this because m6anet uses 0-based indexing to report the position coordinates?
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely,
wfy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear m6anet team,
I have encountered an issue while using your tool and analyzing the output data.site_proba.csv file. It appears the transcript_position values reported in the output are off by 1 compared to the actual position of the m6A sites.
For example, one row in the data.site_proba.csv file is:
ENST00000361453.3,716,28,0.3540786206722260,TGACT,0.2142857142857143
However, the actual position of the A should be 717, not 716.
I wanted to confirm if this observation is correct, is this because m6anet uses 0-based indexing to report the position coordinates?
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely,
wfy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: