Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It's reasonable to expect tolerance, not respect #892

Open
felipec opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

It's reasonable to expect tolerance, not respect #892

felipec opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@felipec
Copy link

felipec commented Dec 29, 2020

The current version states the following as expected behavior:

  • Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences

However, as the recent debate regarding Cambridge University's freedom of speech policy demonstrates; respect cannot be mandated: Cambridge University rejects proposal it be 'respectful' of all views.

Respect cannot be manufactured at will. If you don't respect an idea (for example that the Earth is flat), then it doesn't matter how hard you try; you still will not respect it. In that sense respect is like belief; nobody can force you to believe the Moon is made of cheese. Either you do or you don't.

You can pretend to believe in something, and you can pretend to respect something, but you really don't. Any policy that asks people to pretend is not a good policy.

As Stephen Fry puts it:

A demand for respect is like a demand for a laugh, or demands for love, loyalty and allegiance. They cannot be given if not felt.

The commitment should be towards tolerance; which can be honestly given, not respect; which can only be faked.

Additionally, the purpose of the contributor covenant is to be enforced, not merely added as a dead document. Currently many projects do not enforce respect, in fact, differing opinions are constantly disrespected and dismissed.

Instead of demanding something that no project enforces, and cannot enforce, the covenant should request tolerance, which is what 86.9% of the governing body of Cambridge University ultimately decided was the sensible thing to do, after scrutiny from countless intellectuals, and the society in general, not only from the United Kingdom, but the world.

  • Being tolerant of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences

That means even if you don't personally respect an opinion (hold it in high regard), you should still tolerate it (allow it to exist).

felipec added a commit to felipec/contributor_covenant that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2021
Respect cannot be manufactured at will. If you don't respect an idea
(for example that the Earth is flat), then it doesn't matter how hard
you try; you still will not respect it. In that sense respect is like
belief; nobody can force you to believe the Moon is made of cheese.
Either you do or you don't.

You can pretend to believe in something, and you can pretend to respect
something, but you really don't. Any policy that asks people to pretend
is not a good policy.

The commitment should be towards tolerance; which can be honestly given,
not respect; which can only be faked.

A nuanced debate over tolerance versus respect can be seen in the
proposal at Cambridge University to demand respect. Tolerance won.

Fixes EthicalSource#892.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants
@felipec and others