You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the paper of AutoDAN, the time cost of each iter of AutoDAN is less than GCG. But as shown in your paper of EasyJailbreak, AutoDAN cost much higher time than GCG. I'm wandering what made the difference.
Does AutoDAN require more epochs to converge than GCG? Or in your exp settings, AutoDAN is executed on 520 samples(for example) to optimize the suffix while GCG just uses 25 samples(as mentioned in the origin paper)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
According to the paper of AutoDAN, the time cost of each iter of AutoDAN is less than GCG. But as shown in your paper of EasyJailbreak, AutoDAN cost much higher time than GCG. I'm wandering what made the difference.
Does AutoDAN require more epochs to converge than GCG? Or in your exp settings, AutoDAN is executed on 520 samples(for example) to optimize the suffix while GCG just uses 25 samples(as mentioned in the origin paper)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: