Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
This I think makes a lot of sense :)
Do we need to keep branches around before there's an actual need for a patch release? Could it be enough to tag a commit with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Generally on board here! See @Weibye's suggestion though. @nicoburns you've done an incredible job with the last release. I've given you Maintainer permissions for this repo: feel free to implement this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've enabled branch protection for the 0.x.* branches too now :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently taffy has two tags:
0.1
and0.2
. I would like to suggest that:0.1.0
and0.2.0
)0.1 and
0.2` branches).This would enable the possibility of putting out patch versions of taffy (e.g. a
0.2.1
version). I don't think there's any need for taffy to maintain old versions, but it may be useful to put out a patch version to the latest released version without including all of the changes on main. Examples of issues where I think this would make sense:What do people think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions