Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SiameseKPConv 和MambaCD对比 #29

Closed
pingcong opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

SiameseKPConv 和MambaCD对比 #29

pingcong opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@pingcong
Copy link

非常感谢您的指导,成功复现MambaCD而且在2D变化检测达到sota,因为自己刚接触这块领域,关注到在3D提出了SiameseKPConv ,不知道是否针对这两个模型进行过对比呢

@ChenHongruixuan
Copy link
Owner

Thank you again for your interest in our work, as well as being glad you reproduced our accuracy.

Note that SiameseKPConv is for 3D change detection, which is very different from 2D change detection. Therefore ChangeMamba and SiameseKPConv are not comparable. However, you can try to apply the Mamba model to 3D change detection.

Best,

@pingcong
Copy link
Author

的确,这也是一个非常不错的想法,ChangeMamba应用于三维变化检测之前有相关的验证码

@ChenHongruixuan
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

If you are talking about change detection of 3D point cloud data, then no. Note that point cloud data and remote sensing image data are very different.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants