You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The position of ApiTypes is awkward because it is not really enforced and there is no way to enforce that we have to use the information in it.
For the type definition part, could we use the TypeFactory to define the types of some specific roles?
And for the XXXMethodName part, I think we could always put those part in a suitable place in our expressions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the issue or request
The position of
ApiTypes
is awkward because it is not really enforced and there is no way to enforce that we have to use the information in it.For the type definition part, could we use the
TypeFactory
to define the types of some specific roles?And for the
XXXMethodName
part, I think we could always put those part in a suitable place in our expressions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: