Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃挕 Feature Request - Multi-Region ALZs #375

Open
xelizondo opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

馃挕 Feature Request - Multi-Region ALZs #375

xelizondo opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request long-term We will do it, but will take a longer amount of time due to complexity/priorities

Comments

@xelizondo
Copy link

xelizondo commented Nov 3, 2022

Per this https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/enterprise-scale/faq#how-do-we-enable-more-azure-regions-when-we-use-azure-landing-zone-architecture

Could additional functionality be extended to accommodate multi-region ALZs (platform and workloads) scenarios where customer wants to deploy n regions and have things plumbed correctly per region base for example, diagnostics set to their regional LAW, hubs peered between them etc. although AAD logs would only go to 1 LAW since it is not regional.

@danycontre per our chat

@xelizondo xelizondo added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 3, 2022
@ghost ghost added the Needs: Triage 馃攳 Needs triaging by the team label Nov 3, 2022
@jtracey93 jtracey93 added Needs: Author Feedback Awaiting feedback from the issue/PR author and removed Needs: Triage 馃攳 Needs triaging by the team labels Nov 3, 2022
@jtracey93
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @xelizondo,

Thanks for the issue.

This is possible today with the modules, you'd just need to pass in different parameters for the different regions as you require.

So technically this is already possible.

You'd just need to make an additional policy assignment for the diagnostics stuff to send the stuff to a different LAW, but this is not something we recommend in ALZ guidance 馃憤

Happy to discuss further, let me know if this helps

Thanks

Jack

@xelizondo
Copy link
Author

@jtracey93 Thanks for the reply. Dany mentioned something similar. let me review as I am just getting familiar with this ALZ-Bicep repo. If I have questions I will reach out to you.

@ghost ghost added Needs: Attention 馃憢 Needs attention from the maintainers and removed Needs: Author Feedback Awaiting feedback from the issue/PR author labels Nov 3, 2022
@jtracey93
Copy link
Contributor

@xelizondo please do and if we need to add any docs or clarity, happy to do that but let us know.

Perhaps you could contribute if you wish to also if anything is needed 馃憤馃憤

@jtracey93 jtracey93 added long-term We will do it, but will take a longer amount of time due to complexity/priorities and removed Needs: Attention 馃憢 Needs attention from the maintainers labels Nov 3, 2022
@jtracey93 jtracey93 self-assigned this Nov 3, 2022
@xelizondo
Copy link
Author

Yes, I will attempt to build this on a fork perhaps with a bit of Dany's help

@jtracey93
Copy link
Contributor

linking to #387 as a relation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request long-term We will do it, but will take a longer amount of time due to complexity/priorities
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants