Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support veto from all user #378

Open
Corantin opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Support veto from all user #378

Corantin opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
App 📱 User-facing issues Contracts 🌞 Smart Contract issues

Comments

@Corantin
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@Corantin Corantin added App 📱 User-facing issues Contracts 🌞 Smart Contract issues labels Sep 23, 2022
@Corantin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

When a disputed result in "abstained from voting", we should let people cancel the claim that will veto it under the hood.
DOD :

  • UI should tell the user that the dispute has not been ruled (the jury abstained from voting)
  • GovernQueue contract "Resolve" method should redirect to "Veto" method in this case (the jury abstained from voting)
  • The veto state should be displayed as cancelled

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
App 📱 User-facing issues Contracts 🌞 Smart Contract issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant